Preview

Drop image here or click to upload

Drop image here

File too large (max 20MB)

Sensitive masking is a publishing policy problem—tools do not replace platform rules

`nudity-censor` addresses compliance framing: news art, health education stills, museum web catalogs, and UGC sanitized for broad audiences. Small cells or narrow strips can preserve recognizable body outlines in square thumbnails, tripping automated moderation. Know the destination category and age gate, then mask beyond the minimum if algorithms demand it. Medical or art contexts often need surrounding context—use uniform blocks instead of suggestive strips. Chatting originals internally while posting masked versions still leaves risky copies in logs; restrict master distribution. Identifiable people may need consent beyond pixels alone. Public research on reconstruction means high-risk material should not rely on mosaic alone—crop, substitute stock, or withhold. Document approvers on outbound files to keep an audit trail.

Sensitive masking workflow

  1. In `nudity-censor`, map platform rules, then mask with margin for thumbnail and cover crops.
  2. Prefer large regular blocks or solid bars; validate animated covers and square crops.
  3. Limit internal sharing of masters and log reviewer approval on exports.

Sensitive masking Q&A

Still rejected after mosaic?
Models read silhouette and context; widen masks, swap illustrative stock, or change category.
Are thin black bars okay?
Often reads as suggestive; large uniform masks or reframing are safer.
Does mosaic stop professional restoration?
Never treat it as absolute; for high-risk assets, crop, replace, or do not publish.
Before publishing `nudity-censor` assets externally, which compliance checks are mandatory beyond visual quality?
Start with "align brand policy checks", "retain source/output evidence", and "lock dimension tiers first", then explicitly verify "detail loss after compression" and "approval-gap regressions" before release approval.
Under deadline pressure, how should teams balance speed and stability in `nudity-censor` processing?
Start with "define size thresholds explicitly", "align brand policy checks", and "lock dimension tiers first", then explicitly verify "upload rejection by size policy" and "color profile mismatch" before release approval.
More versions